Your compliance stack detects. It doesn’t investigate.

We spend 30 minutes on your compliance operation — alert volume, false-positive rate, where the hours concentrate, and what your next exam or audit looks like. If there’s a fit, the next step is a paid Compliance Automation Diagnostic: one week, three interviews, and a ranked roadmap of your top five automation opportunities. No generic pitch deck. No obligation.

A paid one-week engagement that maps your compliance program before any system is built. Three structured interviews, a full review of your workflows, and a ranked list of your top five automation opportunities with a phased build roadmap. The fee is credited in full toward your first build — the lowest-risk way to see exactly where AI fits before you commit.

Both — because under US law they’re frequently the same thing. A licensed payment company and a digital asset platform typically register with FinCEN as MSBs, run BSA/AML programs against the same pillars, and file SARs under the same 30-day deadline. What differs is the data.

Most compliance stacks handle fiat transaction data well and go blind at the chain boundary. We work across both — which matters more every quarter, as stablecoin flows land in companies that were never built to investigate them.

Into your environment, and nowhere else. Systems run in your cloud tenancy. Models are accessed through AWS Bedrock or Azure OpenAI inside that tenancy — customer data is not sent to third-party model providers and is not retained for training. We document the full data flow before any build begins, in a form your sponsor bank’s third-party risk review can evaluate directly.

Every system is built for your firm — not a shared platform, not a generic tool with your logo on it. It runs in your environment, integrates with the tools you already use, and ships with full documentation and training. Your team owns it completely. No platform subscription, no lock-in.

Every determination the system produces cites its source, and every step leaves an audit trail. Filing decisions stay with your BSA Officer, documented exactly as they are today.

Minimal. After the discovery call, we handle the technical work. Most builds require 3–5 hours of your team’s time across a few weeks for workflow input and review. You stay focused on your product and your users. We come to you only when a decision requires your judgment.

We measure against your baseline from day one, so ROI is concrete rather than claimed. The diagnostic establishes that baseline — alert volume, false-positive rate, hours per case, time-to-file — before anything is built. Most firms have never measured these, which is why the diagnostic is useful whether or not you continue with us.

The common wins show up within the first month: fewer false positives reaching analysts, faster case throughput, and shorter time from determination to filing.

Most AI tools fail for one of two reasons: they solve the wrong problem, or nobody adopts them. We avoid the first by starting with a specific workflow that’s already costing you measurable hours. We avoid the second by building around how your team actually works — and staying through adoption before we step away.

The deeper reason off-the-shelf tools underperform here is that they sit on top of fragmented data. Detection quality is limited by what the system can see, and most stacks can’t see across fiat and on-chain in the same case. That’s the layer we build.

Primarily US. We take selected engagements in English-operating markets where we can read every artifact the system produces — including the UK, Ireland, Canada, and much of EU fintech, where compliance functions run in English.

If your filing language isn’t English, we’ll tell you on the first call rather than three weeks in. In that case we can still build triage, KYB review, screening adjudication, and on-chain context — everything except regulator-facing narrative drafting.